Rin's blog

April 20, 2023

Last Blog Last Mil Post

Filed under: Uncategorized —— Rin @ 11:25 pm

Last blog of the school year! Congratulations to anyone reading this, whether upset or relieved that we will no longer be writing blogs every other week. Though, out of my uncreativity, I will just continue off of my previous topics: military technology. This time I will also talk about two things.

 

PK: AK reliability in a DP-sized package

The PK machine gun: Kalashnikov’s Machine Gun, is a 7.62×54mmR caliber general-purpose machine gun (GPMG) developed in the Soviet Union and used all around the world, much like the AK (also designed by Kalashnikov). The development traces back to the 1940’s, again – a lot like the AK. After WW2 ended, the Soviets wanted a standard and caliber-matching machine gun in 7.62×39, which became the RPD. The RPD was decent, however it suffered from reliability issues and most notably the sharp range drop-off of 7.62×39. A new design was needed. A competition was hosted in the 50’s, with the requirements being a “7.62×54R general-purpose company/battalion level machine gun.” By 58, several designs were submitted; a major design being the Nikitin-Sokolov MG. Late into the competition, the Kalashnikov team joined in and stole the show, with their design being more reliable and cheaper to produce (a biggie for the Russians), and so, the PK was put into service in 1961. The design, as mentioned before, is incredibly simple: a gas-actuated claw snags onto the rimmed case of the 7.62R, pulls it back and feeds it into the firing chamber, the chamber locks into place with the rotating locking lugs, and it fires. Rinse and repeat. The gas system is literally an AK’s but flipped upside down. Barrel changing is easy as well, with the barrel locking into place using a sliding bar that can be pushed out to unlock. The design was a major hit, and nearly every Soviet-aligned country got in on it. The most common PK’s on the market today are Polish or Hungarian, with some copies being produced in Yugoslavia/Serbia (Zastava M84), Bulgaria (MG-series), and China (Type 80). The PK design was further modernized in ’69 with the PKM, removing the external barrel flutes and adding a rounded front trunnion, as well as simplifying the feed cover, stock, and receiver rivets. A revised shorter flash hider was also made, but is often switched out for the long-slotted one.

 

The next topic of discussion is the AS Val: Spetsnaz’s Silent Stalker. The AS Val, otherwise known as 6P30, “Silent Assault Rifle,” or the SA Avalanche for you weird Eastern European gamers, is an integrally-suppressed automatic rifle that specifically fires subsonic ammunition. Coming about in 1987, it was a long-needed rifle for Soviet specialized troops. The Val entered service with its twin, the VSS Vintorez, and was welcomed warmly by those who used it; it was reliable, quiet, accurate, powerful, and best of all – it was very cool. The 80’s, the Soviet-Afghan War; Spetsnaz commandos deep in enemy territory use AKs fitted with large suppressors that wear out quickly under extended use. Every one of these soldiers wishes they had a different rifle, a special rifle. Then comes Pyotr Serdyukov and Vladimir Krasnikov. Through black magic they can sense the soldiers’ woes, and they start on a new design. Right off the bat the prototypes already look nearly identical to the final product, with a long, tubular, detachable suppressor fitted to an AK-style receiver. The ammunition, however? 7.62×39mm; supersonic.

This would not do. Work begins separately on a new cartridge; first designs use an 8mm rimmed cartridge, then 5.45×39 but cut down, and then finally: 9×39mm. Slow-moving, but hard-hitting-  it was perfect. By late ’86 – early ’87, the rifle was ready to go. Minor modifications throughout the design process made it what we know today. The action is simple, like an AK: long-stroke gas piston located in the handguard, allowing for a high fire rate of 900pm. The safety, also like an AK. However, the fire selector is located just behind the trigger, using a rotating catch-style of switch. The receiver is essentially an AK derivative, but the frontal end is not. The long suppressor covers the relatively short barrel and has removable internal baffles to reduce report. The barrel also has holes drilled into it to allow the gas to escape. The Val features a metal folding stock, like an AKS-74, and a large side-mounted scope rail for optics.

It saw heavy service in Moscow, Chechnya, Ukraine, etc. But most importantly, it saw heavy service in Stalker.

 

Thank you for reading!

April 6, 2023

Rifle post!

Filed under: Uncategorized —— Rin @ 2:13 pm

Although I just went on a field trip to a tank garden in Military history, I talked about tanks in my last blog so this blog I won’t debrief the trip. I’ve changed topics in my blogs quite a lot, but this time I’m going to continue on talking about certain military technologies. Last blog I talked about two types of tanks, so this time I will talk about two types of rifles.

   M16A1E1 (Colt 645): I’ve been interested in relatively obscure rifle variants for a long time now, and one of my favorites is the Colt 645, otherwise known as the M16A1E1. This rifle came about in 1981 as a long-needed upgrade to the M16A1 and CAR-15s still in service since the 1960’s. This wasn’t the first prototype that sought to upgrade standard service rifles, but it definitely was the most influential in adopting what would later become the M16A2.

The 645 introduced – or at least solidified – several key upgrades. The HBAR (heavy barrel) previously seen only on light machine gun versions of the M16A1 was finally introduced to a regular rifle; M16A1 “pencil-weight” barrels had a tendency to bend with rough-use in the field, especially in Vietnam where trees and vines would often get snagged on the barrel during combat and panicked soldiers would violently rip the rifle out of them. Not only that, but further testing in the 70’s showed that barrels would deform when heated due to excessive firing, which would affect accuracy and reliability. The 645 also introduced a terribly needed rear sight upgrade. On the A1, the rear sight had no elevation adjustment – only a horrific windage adjustment “knob” (not even an actual knob). Now, the rear sight had an elevation adjustment wheel AND an actual knob to adjust the windage. A truly welcomed change. A brass deflector was also included, but this wasn’t introduced on the A11. Late model M16A1s actually had a brass deflector (albeit, these models are rare). At last, we reach the internals. This was the first time the BURST setting was introduced, every previous military M16 rifle had the SSA fire selector (SAFE -SEMI – AUTO). Despite popular belief, no auto setting was included on this rifle. However, the lower receivers often were not re-engraved with the burst included, so some 645/A1 lowers instead simply had sheets of paper (with the new settings written on them) slipped over the original selector settings. One thing to note; ALL receivers used for the 645 are marked “M16A1” with the correct A1 serial numbers despite the changes. Think of these rifles as just M16A2s with M16A1 stampings and serials.

 

The next rifle I will talk about is the Howa Type 89 – Armalite from the Orient. The Howa Type 89 is the Japanese standard issue select-fire 5.56×45mm rifle. Introduced in 1989 (hence the 89 in the designation), this rifle still serves the JSDF today with hardly any changes made to the design. The origins of this rifle date back to the 1960’s, and in the US. Armalite had just designed the AR-15 and it was accepted for military service, so they wanted more. Then comes the AR-18 – a simpler design aimed at providing smaller countries with a capable rifle. Armalite reached out to Japan (who had just adopted the Type 64) to see if they wanted to produce the rifle under license and possibly adopt it. Japan ended up producing the AR-18 in limited numbers via the Howa factory (the AR-18 is also why Japan has such strict military export laws after Howa rifles ended up in the hands of the IRA). Set the scene to the 1980’s – the Type 64 is becoming outdated, intermediate rounds are cool. Japan looks at their old AR-18 blueprints and decides to

design a domestic rifle using some components of the Armalite. The action, folding stock (para model), rear sights, magazine, and overall look are all derived from the AR-18. However, some changes are made:

– SS3A fire selector, the 18 either has SSA or SS

– Proprietary magazines are used, with slots in the side (interchangeable with the AR-18 though)

– Side-vented handguard

– Rifle grenade device

The rifle officially entered service in 1989. A folding stock variant was made for paratroopers, and a 2007 BR variant was made for vehicle crews as well. In the 2000’s and 2010’s, efforts were made to update the design (one with pic rails and a massive scope), but none really stuck, thankfully. In conclusion, the Howa rifle is pretty cool.

 

Thanks for reading!

March 2, 2023

Tank post!

Filed under: Uncategorized —— Rin @ 10:44 pm

Going on a little interest rant, I’d like to talk about two different tanks and their history as well as their failings. I guess this is kind of a tank post instead of a post about the government, but hopefully you enjoy it just as much!

The first tank in my discussion is the Type 90 Kyu-Maru, a mix of East and West. Tracing its design back to 1976 with the TK-X program, the Type 90 was developed in order to replace the already aging Type 74 (which was adopted only a year earlier). The design was to use several key features from the Type 74; hydraulic suspension (essential for the hilly terrain of Japan), an autoloader, laser rangefinder, and a small vehicle size, among other things. Starting in 1981, a series of prototypes were developed and manufactured. The first prototype (TK-X-0001) was completed by 1982, and looked incredibly advanced for its time. It used an indigenous Japan Steel Works 120mm main gun and had a different armor layout than production vehicles, as the turret front had an odd amount of angling. Massive optics were placed upon the tank’s roof as well. The second series of prototypes (TK-X-0002) were completed by 1989, and used an exterior design similar to the German Leopard 2. These still retained the JSW 120mm gun, and a slightly different armor layout (i.e “false” panels on the turret cheeks, to demonstrate the addition of armor upgrades that would be present in the future). These prototypes are nearly identical to serial Type 90s, but the Type 74-ish smoke launchers, fabric-covered add-on turret armor, and mounting brackets on the lower hull plate are dead giveaways.The finalized Type 90 was officially adopted in 1990, and mass production began the same year. A number of changes were made to the final vehicle; the gun was replaced with a license-made Rh-120, the turret armor was no longer fake, and the fire control system was improved. The gun/optic combination that the Type 90 used was likely the best in the world at the time of it’s introduction. The conveyor-belt autoloader loaded shells in 3 – 5 seconds, and the gunner’s main optic allowed for tracking and hit probability to be displayed. The vehicle was powered by a 1500hp engine, allowing it to travel at speeds up to 70 km/h. Overall, the vehicle is great. But even now, the Type 90 still hasn’t replaced the Type 74 in service due to budget issues. It also hasn’t seen any combat, so its true combat effectiveness is unknown…

The second tank of our discussion is the Panzer 68: when “innovation” creates issues.

We all know the Swiss for their quality, right? Whether it be knives, or cheese, or straight-pull rifles, or mountains… whatever. But what if I told you that in the 1960’s, Switzerland actually created something that really sucked? Believe it or not – it’s true, and I’m here to explain.

The Panzer 68 entered official service in 1971, but the design clearly traces its roots back to the Panzer 61, which began production only 3 years before. The Panzer 68 was generally more of a modernization of the 61 under a different name than a new tank entirely. I mean, they’re basically identical. The improvements over the Panzer 61 included a wider track setup, a stabilization system for the main cannon (why they didn’t have this before baffles me), a new suspension system, pressurized main cannon breech, new heating unit for the crew, new high-range radio, and a new engine that allowed the tank to reach speeds of up to 55 km/h. Sounds all good, right? Yeah, no. This tank sucks so much that I need an entire section about it. The technical issues were revealed in 1977 by Weltwoche, with an article so controversial that it literally caused the resignation of the Swiss defense minister. This article revealed several problems. First of all, the NBC protection in the vehicle was lacking, to the point where crews would have to wear gas masks. And the new heating system and pressurized gun breech I mentioned earlier? Yeah, when the heating was turned on, it had a high chance to FIRE the main gun on a whim. The gearbox was also horrible, with the tank needing to stop entirely just to switch into reverse, or else the gears would break. The new radio also interfered with the turret drive, causing it to spin out of control when the radio was used at full power (this, combined with the spontaneous main gun, was CATASTROPHIC.)

Thank you for reading!

February 9, 2023

Spirits of the Dead by Edgar Allemo Poe

Filed under: Uncategorized —— Rin @ 10:01 pm

Edgar Allen Poe is a pretty emo guy, so my first thoughts reading this poem was “wow, this guy is an edge lord.” I mean lines like “dark thoughts of the gray tombstone,” “Be silent in that solitude,” this guy hasn’t left his Halloween phase. 

I thought that the rest of the poem was going to follow suit to his first stanza, although, when I read the poem further, I found that Poe wasn’t only writing about dark imagery and ghosts, but also stars and religion; two pairs of things that seem like they’re on opposite sides of the spectrum. Even weirder, the spirits from the dead were associated with more comforting words than the stars. In the second stanza, Poe states that we are actually not alone, because the spirits of the dead are with us, and in death they are around us. Compare this to the third stanza, Poe writes that “the stars shall not look down from their high thrones in heaven,” indicating that these celestial beings that throughout history have been worshiped as good, have no care for us. He gives them a pompous nature, putting them on thrones that show they don’t even have an intention to be close to the speaker.

Another thing to notice is the structure of the poem; Poe follows an AABB rhyme form in the first stanza, and then an ABACC scheme, and then AABBCCDD and then AABB and AABBCC. Simple enough in rhyme, the punctuation seems to vary; hyphens and commas are interchanged with no pattern. Reading through the poem a second time, I wondered why Poe added so many hyphens into the poem- they seem to replace the commas at times, but there is no formula to when he would use commas or hyphens. Another pattern I noticed is Poe’s use of alliteration- for example, silent and solitude, visions and vanish, and breeze and breath. Each of these pairs reinforce the atmospheric imagery in the poem, e.g. silent and solitude emphasize the s sound, which is soothing but can also be unsettling to a reader. This is perfect as Poe emphasizes the companionship of death in the second stanza. Poe also uses assonance as in the first stanza, “thy soul shall find itself alone,” where the o sound is emphasized. Oftentimes opera songs or holy chants emphasize o sounds, which reinforces the ethereal atmosphere of this poem.

After my initial two reads of this poem, I decided to return to the main picture to better understand the theme of this poem. Since Poe states in the first line that there is a soul finding itself alone mid thoughts of a tombstone, I assume that the speaker is in a cemetery perhaps on the brink of death or already dead. In the cemetery, the speaker finds themselves amongst others deceased- but since they are dead, there is no sound or movement in the cemetery, hence “be silent in that solitude, which is not loneliness.” Poe then states that the speaker will be joined again with those who died in his life, in death: “the spirits of the dead who stood in life before thee are again.” In the third stanza the speaker becomes more removed from life, symbolized by the aversion the stars have towards them as well as the fact that the “light like hope” is weary as a burning fever. Oftentimes we think of stars and light as life and the absence of light as death, and in this stanza the stars do not “look down” onto the speaker, indicating the further spiral into death. The speaker also thinks of light as weary as a fever, demonstrating the fact that they find life perhaps tiring and want to succumb to death instead. In the fourth stanza, the speaker seems to have passed onto the afterlife as Poe states that they “now are visions ne’er to vanish,” which I assume means that the speaker is now a memory. Poe then writes that these deaths will come and go just like “dewdrop from the grass,” a natural process. Once the speaker has passed, Poe praises the mysteriousness of death, illustrating it almost as a separate realm. Poe writes that the “breath of god” is a mist; in death, many religions believe that you meet god, so thus this mist is probably related to the afterlife. Furthermore, he writes that this “mist upon the hill” is shadowy and unbroken- the use of shadowy emphasizing the dark imagery in the poem while unbroken illustrates the vastness of the shadow. This exemplifies that this misty hill is a realm of death, which is oftentimes thought of as neverending darkness in many religions. In the end of this stanza, Poe ends with an exclamation mark: “A mystery of mysteries!” The joyful tone contrasts with the earlier calm and serene tone of death, demonstrating that in death there is still good to be found.

So why did Poe write this beautifully goth poem? My best guess is that Poe wants to show his audience that death is not so bad, and it’s less tiring than living. His interweaving of holy assonance and serene alliteration further the beauty of death through his eyes. Sometimes we should just embrace things and find the beauty in it, just like Poe finds the beauty in the mystery of death.

January 19, 2023

A Lawful Criminal

Filed under: Uncategorized —— Rin @ 10:42 pm

Since many people seem to have a certain theme when talking about their blog, I decided that I might just stick to talking about the government and other agencies’ crimes against its citizens. Continuing from my last post, I will now be talking about a few events leading up to 9/11. So, it was found that in 1989, Bush and Reagan were involved in pedophilic call-boy rings. Used as a criminal slang to describe an illegally underage male prostitute, unfortunately this sick and degenerate perversion was associated with our government. Even worse, these illegal acts were protected at the highest levels as pentagon workers were found to have downloaded child pornography, according to the Guardian. Keep in mind, these high-level government workers were at risk of blackmail due to that as well as some of this illegal imagery was downloaded on government computers. Nevertheless, in discussing the consequences for the perpetrators, one of the individuals allegedly involved was not charged but sent to a lower-level job in New Mexico. Not only this, but according to a Yahoo News article, the Pentagon declined to investigate the hundreds of purchases of child pornography. In 2006, an Immigration and Customs Enforcement investigated the purchases of that illegal media and more than 250 civilian and military employees of the Defense Department turned up. But, the Pentagon only investigated a handful of the cases.

We observe what appears to be a pattern of corruption, perversion, lies, and acts that can be used in powerful and controlling blackmail. Bush and Reagan’s involvement with underage call-boys is an example of that. Although this could’ve possibly been a chance for America to set straight the corruption following the Iran-Contra affair, the public went undisturbed. The American public’s hypnotic somnolence continued and these reports were brushed off for the predictable and palatable evening news, various celebrity dramas, or the latest sports games. This episode represents a major moral failure, in which we tacitly gave consent to those perpetrating these evil actions by not forcing accountability. Each time we did not hold these people accountable for their blatantly illegal acts, it emboldened them further, and confirmed to them that they were “untouchable.”

As if that wasn’t bad enough, it came to light that the Reagan administration intelligence agencies engaged in the global illegal narcotics trade. Drugs, Law Enforcement, and Foreign Policy, was the final report of an investigation by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee’s Subcommittee on Terrorism, Narcotics, and International Operations. These government documents, comprising a major portion of what is called the Iran-Contra Affair, are available through the Justice Department if you want to read it yourself. In this report we read that the “Contra drugs included payments to drug traffickers by the U.S. State Department of funds authorized by the Congress for humanitarian assistance to the Contras.” These actions represent an undeniable organized crime element operating from within the U.S. Government. An article from PBS summarizes these illegal acts, committed  and sanctioned by the highest levels of the government. In this article, a DEA agent states that they believe “elements working for the CIA were involved in bringing drugs into the country.” This was further supported as pilots had admitted to bringing drugs into the U.S. In addition, any effort to keep the CIA from the world of drug trafficking was “off-the books.” 

To close this introductory section to 9/11, we will examine a time one of our closest allies performed a shocking and unthinkable false-flag attempt and betrayal of the United States, when in 1967 Israel intentionally attacked the American warship USS Liberty— killing or wounding around 200 people, and attempting to blame it on Egypt in order to draw the U.S. into the Six Day War.

According to the Chicago Tribune, many survivors of the USS Liberty were angry that Israel would attack an important ally, then say the attack was a case of mistaken identity by Israeli pilots who had confused “the U.S. Navy’s most distinctive ship with an Egyptian horse-cavalry transport that was half its size and had a dissimilar profile.” Furthermore, their own government, the U.S. government, refused to investigate the matter. Later on, a newly published document by the State Archives states that the Americans have findings that show the pilots were aware the ship was American. Another partly censored CIA document reveals a conversation between an Israeli pilot to an IDF war room.

 

Israeli pilot to IDF war room: This is an American ship. Do you still want us to attack?

 

IDF war room to Israeli pilot: Yes, follow orders.

 

Israeli pilot to IDF war room: But sir, it’s an American ship- I can see the flag!

 

IDF war room to Israeli pilot: Nevermind; hit it.

 

Although I am not yet finished with the event, I will save the rest for next week. Thank you for reading and I am perfectly happy and content with my life!

December 21, 2022

Parking Spaces and Living Life

Filed under: Uncategorized —— Rin @ 11:28 am

Although this semester went by fast, here are some of my favorite lessons from these five months!

One: Naperville North’s parking structure is the most hazardous thing on earth, and I have come to understand that I will always have beef with parking spaces.

Two: You can learn a lot about optimism from washing the dishes everyday in Senior Foods; a mundane task but, with a tasty result!

Three: Ashley Chen gives really great life advice; I have come to learn from our many before test car rides that grades aren’t everything.

Reading these three things may have you confused, but I will explain how I came to learn these.

First off, trying to shimmy through Naperville North’s exit roads squeezed sweat out of me like a wet towel. I thought that I was a patient person, but after 5 months of 20 minute exit times from school, I think I have repressed anger issues. Because there is really only one exit out of each parking lot, everyone has to bring out their generosity and practice yielding. I have learned that many people do not hold this generosity in their hearts, and oftentimes three way roads become one way roads with two lines on each side that are waiting for people in that one road to LET THEM OUT AS WELL. This selfishness will push people to try and cut into already moving cars, I am totally not speaking from experience, which proves hazardous because many cars will start honking and you may come close to grazing cars. Worth it to get out of the unnecessarily long line though. Also in the NPAC, there are two different turns at the exit, but only one line leading to the two turns. Many people who want to turn left then have to wait just as long as the people who want to turn right even though there are less people wanting to turn left. Ashley has heard me rant about this many times, but I believe we should have two roads so that people who want to turn left can just go. Otherwise, many of us will cut into the lane of cars coming in, which is a very scary thing. On that topic, I have learned that I’m pretty courageous because I will cut through anything to get out of school. Sometimes it has even crossed my mind to drive my car onto the grass. Ultimately though, I hate parking spaces and the people there and that is the biggest lesson I’ve learned.

Secondly, being a somewhat non-confrontational person in Senior Foods has made me learn to just make the most out of your situation. You see, in Senior Foods there are 4 different jobs you can take: Head chef, Sous chef, Executive chef, and dishwasher. Of course everyone hates doing dish washing and wants to cook instead, which is why we’re supposed to rotate jobs. Unfortunately, many people do not do that and the teacher doesn’t care so some unfortunate people are stuck dish washing the whole semester; that person is me. Whenever I try to cook, my group mates will tell me that they can take over and then squish me out of the kitchen so that they can ask me to wash the dishes. Then I am stuck dish washing for the rest of the period. But, I’ve learned that dish washing is not so bad. For one, you don’t get as dirty, which is nice for germaphobe like me. Second, you still get to eat delicious food and even faster because you are dish washing the whole time so you clean up the kitchen faster. At the end of the day, even if I didn’t get to cook, I get to eat and I think that is the most important part of Senior Foods. So kids, practice your optimism!

Lastly, I have realized that grades should not be as emphasized as society makes it. Ashley and I are carpool buddies, and because we are both in AP classes, we always have some summative thing going on. This leads us to rant and stress all morning and cry about how bad we did coming home. After a few days though, we have come to the conclusion that grades don’t define us. At the end of the day, we are still living fine, and after a few days the C or a B doesn’t matter anymore. So for incoming seniors, realize that it’s your last year, and you shouldn’t put all your stress onto your grades. Take time to decompress for yourself and realize your achievements outside of academics. That is the most validating thing of all.

December 2, 2022

Lawful Deceptors

Filed under: Uncategorized —— Rin @ 2:03 am

A continuation from my previous blog post on the CIA and FBI, I will now discuss some things that our presidents have done in liaison with the CIA- first discussing president George H.W. Bush.

image 2

The official story is that George H.W. Bush only worked for the CIA for several years, around the time he was named as Director of the agency in 1976. However, in 1963, George H.W. Bush was already working for the CIA, and had been for at least a decade already (refer to image 2 from the Salon). George H.W. Bush’s political career began in 1968, the same year Kennedy was assassinated, and there were many official lies and deceptive statements made about the length of time he worked for the CIA- supposedly only a few years around when he was appointed director of the agency, but in reality, since the 50s. Coincidentally, we will find that after the murder of President Kennedy, the goal of utilizing counterfeit terrorist attacks to start foreign wars came to pass soon after, with the Gulf of Tonkin incident. We also find this type of deception used during Bush’s own administration, with the demonstrably false Nayirah Testimony, among other lies told involving drug trafficking, and election manipulation. Next, let’s briefly review three times the government has utilized the Operation Northwoods playbook and conducted deceptive false flag operations on the American public, in order to provoke or instigate their citizens into supporting the government’s push for war.

The Nayirah fraud is significant in that it demonstrates a pattern of behavior from the Bush family. This is a family with, as we read, “no names, no paper trail, no fingerprints”, and one that is willing to spin tremendous deceptions to the public in order to achieve their goals of going to war in the Middle East. True masters of deception, they manipulate our perceptions using the most innocent through their strong-arm control and coercion of the media, as seen in the Nayirah lies. As credible as the government is supposed to be to the people, in the Nayirah lies, this credibility proved to be false. More than just the president, congressmen were in on this scheme- such as congressman Tom Lantos who collaborated with a public firm to produce this deceptive testimony purposely. Another worthy is that Nayirah was not just some Kuwaiti, but the daughter of the Kuwaiti Ambassador to the U.S. This line of government officials involved in lying to the U.S. people is not something new. Although Saddam Hussein has committed atrocities before, he did not commit the crimes accused in this testimony; the accusations put forth in the Nayirah testimony were officially proved false by Amnesty International. Douglas MacArthur, an American military leader, wrote that the hoax helped rally the American people behind calls for military action, and in January 1991, Bush’s war resolution passed the senate with many senators citing Nayirah’s story as justification for authorizing the conflict. This deception from the government was seen again when classified documents from the Gulf of Tonkin incident were released. The tapes further proved that government officials were willing to distort facts to deceive the American public.

image 3

This demonstration of serial or pathological lying didn’t stop with H.W. Bush though, as there is also documented evidence of George W. Bush lying to the public in order to garner support for his wars. As reported by CNN in their 2003 article Fake Iraq documents ‘embarrassing’ for the US, “Intelligence documents that the U.S. and British governments said were strong evidence that Iraq was developing nuclear weapons have been dismissed as forgeries by U.N. weapons inspectors (refer to image 3). However, because the government faced no consequences from the public, they were emboldened to push their destructive lies even further. The intelligence documents were presented to the UN, and represented a fundamental part of the Bush administration’s case for war. 

These historical events constitute literal false flags against the American public, and demonstrate what could be called a pattern of behavior. We know, therefore, that the government seems to have a predilection for false flag attempts, and are not as truthful as they seem to be.

November 10, 2022

The War on Theatrics

Filed under: Uncategorized —— Rin @ 10:51 pm

After a round of personal blog posts, I’ve decided to circle back to my favorite risky topic: exposing the government. In my second post I talked about the CIA, so in this blog post I will talk about the FBI.

The Al Qaeda, the Al Shabaab, the Islamic State- these are what pops into our minds when we think about terrorism. But what if I told you that there was a much bigger terrorist organization? One that is present in our lives even now?

The FBI, an organization portrayed as badass in movies, gunning down bad guys or arresting corrupt politicians; yet, these justice bringers were responsible for more terrorism plots in the United States than any other terrorist organization in the U.S. 

The turn happened after 9/11. FBI became less concerned with gangsters and crooked elected officials, but moreso terrorists, and the pursuit of terrorists had consumed the FBI.

We spend 2.6 billion dollars combined for organized crime, financial fraud, public corruption and all other types of traditional criminal activity, but 3.3 billion dollars on just domestic counterterrorism activities. 

In the 14 years since 9/11, there were about six real terrorist attacks in the United States: the Boston marathon bombings and other failed attacks. In those same 14 years, however, the Bureau boasted about foiling dozens of terrorism plots, arresting more than 175 people in aggressive, undercover conterterrorism stings.

To run these operations, the FBI employs informants to find terrorists before they can strike. These informants are oftentimes criminals of high calibers that earn 100k for every case they bring to the FBI. These operations often create terrorists from mentally ill and economically unstable people, namely from the muslim community which is disproportionately targeted.

Case 1: Abu Khalid Abdul-Latif, a druggie with suicidal tendencies, and Walli Mujahidh, who had a bad case of schizophrenia. Both were arrested in 2012 when the FBI accused them of conspiring to attack a military installation in Seattle, though the weapons they used were both given by the FBI…

Case 2: the 2009 Bronx terrorism plot. In 2009, there was a plot to bomb synagogues in the Bronx. Led by an FBI informant who had fled Pakistan on murder charges, the informant had offered James Cromtie 250,000 dollars if he participated in that plot. James Cromtie, like the rest of the FBI’s victims, was a minimum wage earner with many mental problems.

Case 3: Sami Osmakac. Osmakac was a broke schizophrenic, though nothing out of the ordinary otherwise. He had no connections to terrorist groups whatsoever. Nonetheless, the FBI made him a victim. An informant offered him money and a stable job, wanting to lure him into a plot to bomb an Irish bar.

Even more interesting, all these transcripts about these plots and recordings about them were sealed and placed under a protective order in an attempt to prevent it from getting to the hands of journalists. As stated by Trevor Aaronson, “behind closed doors, the lead agent, the squad supervisor, described their would-be terrorist as a ‘retarded fool who didn’t have a pot to piss in.’” They thought his ambitions were stupid, a pipe dream that would never happen.

But that didn’t stop the FBI. AK-47, car bombs, martyrdom videos, money for transportation to commit these acts of terrorism- all of it was provided by the FBI. The Hollywood-esque ending as well, where Osmakac’s villain story was ended abruptly by the heroes of justice in his final act to deliver a car bomb. He was then sentenced to 40 years in prison.

Not only Osmakac, but more than 175 FBI groomed “terrorists” have Hollywood endings created by the FBI. This so-called War on Terror is really just a big theater act, a governmentally directed movie that stars mentally ill men like Sami Osmakac, unwitting actors in a carefully choreographed production brought to you by the FBI. 

Our protector of the American people is the single most powerful tool at creating destructors to the American people. The FBI is much better at creating terrorists than it is at catching terrorists. As concerning as this is, the degree of danger these facts pose do not match up to the amount of media exposure it gets. Our lives are carefully controlled so that we don’t see these facts, but we can’t let it stay that way. The next FBI groomed victim could be someone just next to you: a lonely man with a poor job, easily influenced by the idea of a better life. More than just sympathy points though, the acts they could commit with government provided weapons will kill; and location is not discriminated against by the FBI. Protect your loved ones, learn about what really has the power to harm you.

October 28, 2022

Filed under: Uncategorized —— Rin @ 1:43 am

Depression; an umbrella term that encompasses so much yet means so little. It’s a generic word; an ordinary feeling that everyone can sympathize with, but nobody can empathize with. At first, I was reluctant to choose this word; I am guilty of treating the word depression as something dramatic and laughable. It’s such a broad and prevalent word that everything to be said about depression has already been heard: sadness, anxiety, self-destructiveness, hopelessness, loneliness. It’s not distinctive and exemplary writing material. Nobody expects to be told something new and enlightening about being sad. But what if depression, for me, didn’t lie in being sad? What if it lay in its stigma?

The first vivid encounter with depression I had wasn’t even about me; it was about a girl in my neighborhood. At that time, she had been sent to a mental institution; a girl with a very similar situation and upbringing as me. She was very young and bright, with many talents undiscovered, so why did she suddenly want to disappear? If she disappeared, all her coaches and friends, how would they feel? Even more so, how would her parents feel? I went home that day and told my mom about this event. I wondered how she would react to this incident about the kid she used to try and make me emulate. 

Her answer was swift and blunt:

“Depression? Her? Why would she have depression? She has such a good life and hasn’t even experienced a war.”

I thought that was a reasonable response, there was not much I could say more since I didn’t know the details of that girl. I then wondered,

“Mom, what would you do… if I had depression?” 

There was a short pause from her, and the next response is an answer I will never forget.

“Depression? You don’t deserve depression. If you had depression I would send you to Africa with all those children who can’t even drink water and let you experience real depression.”

I quickly denied to her any sliver of depression that lay in me. I knew she was right; I had never experienced anything agonizing in my life. I had everything a third world country child would ever want. While civilians were losing limbs and running from bombs in the middle east, I was eating a pancake. I didn’t have a single right to feel depressed; my damage would never be as good as theirs. That’s the worst part of having depression as an overly normal person: your depression is just as ordinary as everyone else’s. Someone else will always have more of a reason to feel sad than you do.

That was the stigma that grew up with me. Everytime I complained or felt bad about myself my parents would always remind me that they’ve been through much more.

“So what? You didn’t get beat up as a child.”

“So what? You have good food and clothing.”

“So what? I’ve had it so much worse.”

My basis to feel sad was swept from under my feet; depression was no longer a feeling of sadness, but a feeling of shame and privilege. Now, after every disheartening experience, my mind would never be on the disheartening part, but rather the fact that the experience didn’t deserve to be disheartening. Then, from the loss of reason to feel sad, would come a new sadness- and this sadness was solely based around my inability to feel sad. Through this, the connotation of depression was slowly molded and redefined. The destructive cycle of feeling sad and then feeling that I didn’t deserve to be sad turned depression into something that didn’t describe sadness. It described the feeling that my experience wasn’t good enough to cause depression.

The old Medieval Latin word for depression, meant “to press down, depress”. Apart from the literal feeling of depression, I connect this to my version of depression: repressing my depression. This definition has always encircled me, and maybe that’s why I’ve never tried pushing up. I’ve always just let myself be pressed deeper down in hopes that one day I wouldn’t be able to go deeper; then maybe my emotions would be worthwhile. 

For me, there was always a fear that if I strayed from my definition of depression- if I stopped pressing my sadness down, then all that damage I experienced would be for nothing. The stigma my parents tied me up in all throughout my childhood was to be worth something- and that, coupled with their attitudes towards mental health, shaped this inferiority-complex-colored definition. 

There is no resolution to this cycle. No call to action or greater purpose can be made from my definition as its literal meaning to me is that it can’t be used for something better. I recognize that my emotion’s worth doesn’t have to come from one aspect; that my feelings shouldn’t need validation from others- but the stigma surrounding me runs me in never ending circles. I will never be able to press up against this depression.

October 14, 2022

Stewie Griffrin

Filed under: Uncategorized —— Rin @ 4:52 am

Today I wanted to diverge from my past two topics and talk about a character from a show I enjoy. Stewie Griffin, an infant whose intellectual ability surpasses all of his family members combined. He’s a character that I would say I sometimes relate to; with plans to conquer the world, kill his mother, and be in bed by 8. 

I mean, who hasn’t thought about ruling the world? Stewie is mirrored off of any other adolescent in that sense, wanting to rule the world in tyranny. As a kid I would cook up plans for world domination where laws would be obeyed my way, no matter how obscure, much like his plans in Lois Kills Stewie where one of his laws was to throw apples at Peter.

Stewie also has constant feuds with his mother as she foils his plans and also tries to kill her. Although my mother is not perfect, I don’t think I would ever have the heart to think of killing her. As a kid I would think that way halfheartedly, which I think is why Stewie does the same. My mother disciplines me the same way Stewie’s mom disciplines him, but I think he just takes it to heart because he’s a baby. Which makes for a funny concept because he’s one of the smartest people in the world, but yet still falls to baby-like problems.

I’m not nearly as smart as him, but I don’t fall for my mom’s tricks all the time. There will be times when I know my mom wants me to do something for her, or I feel her presence to yell at me for something I didn’t do and I can always avoid it. In Family Guy, Stewie has no choice but to sit there and take whatever Lois says. He usually responds by cursing her out or bashing her character, but for some reason no one understands him unless they want to. That’s where Stewie and I are similar. There’s an episode where Stewie walks to his mother’s bedside and continually calls her name till she finally answers. That’s basically what I have to do to get my mom’s attention. I never take it to heart.

I grew up with my family always by my side; my parents both work from home so they were always there with me. Maybe this is common for many of you, but all my cousins were very alienated from their parents. My eldest cousin grew up in America in a boarding school, and she barely saw her mom until she was in college. My second eldest cousins’ dad was a business man, so he was rarely home with them. Considering the fact that the show is called Family Guy, Stewie always has his family with him and other family members visit on the show as well like his grandparents. I have my grandparents on my mom’s side, but my grandpa on my dad’s side had died. Stewie has his Grandmother and father on his mom side, but both his grandparents on his dad side had died; so I guess in a sense you can say me and Stewie are similar considering the fact we have some grandparents and the others we lost. The episodes of his grandparents’ death were funny, but also emotional for Stewie. Stewie and I also have very emotional side in common as well.

Similarly, Stewie and I both value our friends. If there’s ever a time I need to talk about anything I talk to my best friend and speak with pure emotion about it. It can be about sports, boys, or just something that randomly happened, it doesn’t matter. I will go on for hours talking about that same thing until I get to the root of my problem. Stewie is the exact same way. He talks to his best friend Brian Griffin, their dog on the show, or his stuffed teddy bear Rubbert. Any emotions shown in an episode by Stewie he usually has Brian or Rubbert around to talk about it. 

Ultimately, that’s why I relate to Stewie. His exaggerated child-like behavior makes us similar in ways I never thought of before considering the fact that he’s an animated character in a world with no boundaries.

©2025 Rin's blog
Provided by WPMU DEV - The WordPress Experts
Hosted by Naperville Community Unit School District 203 Sites

Skip to toolbar