A continuation from my previous blog post on the CIA and FBI, I will now discuss some things that our presidents have done in liaison with the CIA- first discussing president George H.W. Bush.
image 2
The official story is that George H.W. Bush only worked for the CIA for several years, around the time he was named as Director of the agency in 1976. However, in 1963, George H.W. Bush was already working for the CIA, and had been for at least a decade already (refer to image 2 from the Salon). George H.W. Bush’s political career began in 1968, the same year Kennedy was assassinated, and there were many official lies and deceptive statements made about the length of time he worked for the CIA- supposedly only a few years around when he was appointed director of the agency, but in reality, since the 50s. Coincidentally, we will find that after the murder of President Kennedy, the goal of utilizing counterfeit terrorist attacks to start foreign wars came to pass soon after, with the Gulf of Tonkin incident. We also find this type of deception used during Bush’s own administration, with the demonstrably false Nayirah Testimony, among other lies told involving drug trafficking, and election manipulation. Next, let’s briefly review three times the government has utilized the Operation Northwoods playbook and conducted deceptive false flag operations on the American public, in order to provoke or instigate their citizens into supporting the government’s push for war.
The Nayirah fraud is significant in that it demonstrates a pattern of behavior from the Bush family. This is a family with, as we read, “no names, no paper trail, no fingerprints”, and one that is willing to spin tremendous deceptions to the public in order to achieve their goals of going to war in the Middle East. True masters of deception, they manipulate our perceptions using the most innocent through their strong-arm control and coercion of the media, as seen in the Nayirah lies. As credible as the government is supposed to be to the people, in the Nayirah lies, this credibility proved to be false. More than just the president, congressmen were in on this scheme- such as congressman Tom Lantos who collaborated with a public firm to produce this deceptive testimony purposely. Another worthy is that Nayirah was not just some Kuwaiti, but the daughter of the Kuwaiti Ambassador to the U.S. This line of government officials involved in lying to the U.S. people is not something new. Although Saddam Hussein has committed atrocities before, he did not commit the crimes accused in this testimony; the accusations put forth in the Nayirah testimony were officially proved false by Amnesty International. Douglas MacArthur, an American military leader, wrote that the hoax helped rally the American people behind calls for military action, and in January 1991, Bush’s war resolution passed the senate with many senators citing Nayirah’s story as justification for authorizing the conflict. This deception from the government was seen again when classified documents from the Gulf of Tonkin incident were released. The tapes further proved that government officials were willing to distort facts to deceive the American public.
image 3
This demonstration of serial or pathological lying didn’t stop with H.W. Bush though, as there is also documented evidence of George W. Bush lying to the public in order to garner support for his wars. As reported by CNN in their 2003 article Fake Iraq documents ‘embarrassing’ for the US, “Intelligence documents that the U.S. and British governments said were strong evidence that Iraq was developing nuclear weapons have been dismissed as forgeries by U.N. weapons inspectors (refer to image 3). However, because the government faced no consequences from the public, they were emboldened to push their destructive lies even further. The intelligence documents were presented to the UN, and represented a fundamental part of the Bush administration’s case for war.
These historical events constitute literal false flags against the American public, and demonstrate what could be called a pattern of behavior. We know, therefore, that the government seems to have a predilection for false flag attempts, and are not as truthful as they seem to be.